|
Priority Indicator
#24: Rate of Crimes Against People
Total
Arrest Rate for Crimes Against People
Contents: Background
Information | Data Tables |
Data Charts | Commentary |
Download Data
New: Person
Crimes Data Map (Internet Explorer Users: zoom
to full extent for best map quality)
Background
Information
What
Does This Indicator Mean?
The rate of
crimes against people is a measure of the non-property crimes in a
region. Non-property
crimes include assault, homicide, rape and other types of crimes
against people. A
higher rate of personal crimes is often indicative of broader social
dysfunction, including high rates of poverty, alcohol and drug use
and declining economic indicators.
Referring to
a specific time period and geographic region, this indicator
measures the total number of arrests for crimes against people
divided by the total population of the region, multiplied by 1,000
to determine the rate.
Because
arrests are reported by the police department or sheriff’s office
making the arrest, and not by the residence address of the arrestee,
these rates will vary greatly as a result of political decisions
within a region Further,
the jurisdictions of law enforcement agencies overlap in many cases,
skewing the city-level rates for this measure.
Other Risk Factors or Indicators to
Consider
Crimes
against people are often related to levels of drug and alcohol
abuse, spousal and child abuse, unemployment and poverty within a
community. While the
direct relationships between these factors is not always clear, when
analyzing this indicator, examination of these additional indicators
is recommended. Geographic measures such as population density and
proximity to major cities may also be considered.
Political
decisions also play a major role in determining this indicator. Factors such as legislation which provides for stiffer
criminal penalties, the ratio of police to population, funding for
projects aimed at reducing crime and the existence of programs
targeted at reducing alcohol and drug abuse will all affect the rate
of arrests.
Limitations of the Data
The rate of arrests for crimes
against people should be taken only as a representative measure for
the total level of criminal activity in the region.
To the extent that crimes in an area go unreported this
measure will be artificially low.
This is especially the case with events such as bias crimes
and rape which are traditionally highly under reported.
On the other hand, while the number of arrests can be
directly correlated with the number of convictions, the two measures
are not equal and convictions are generally substantially lower.
These data are reported by the individual law
enforcement agencies within a region.
There is no means of verification that a particular agency
has reported all arrests for a given time period, though these data
are considered highly accurate and reliable.
These data most certainly under report the
number of arrests due to reporting procedures.
If an individual is arrested on more than one charge (e.g.,
DUII and vehicular manslaughter) only the most serious crime
(manslaughter) is captured in the data collection system.
This is a national norm that began in the 1930’s and is
considered standard practice as part of the Uniform Crime Reporting
process nationwide.
Percentages
presented for the purpose of evaluating this indicator are grouped
together by incorporated city to ensure statistical validity.
When fewer than five cases are reported within a region, the
rate is not calculated as the information is not considered
statistically reliable.
Data Sources
-
Arrest figures are from the Oregon Law
Enforcement Data System (LEDS) Oregon Uniform Crime Reporting
Program
-
City
population data are from the US Census Bureau
-
County
population data are from Portland State University
Center for Population Research
Presentation
and Discussion of the Data
The
table below shows the total arrest rates per 1,000 people for crimes
against persons. It contains the total rate for Marion and
Polk Counties, and the rate for places within those two counties.
| |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
| Marion County |
8.19 |
7.91 |
6.10 |
6.11 |
6.37 |
| Polk County |
6.06 |
5.26 |
4.90 |
4.31 |
3.89 |
|
Marion County
Places
|
| Aumsville |
1.80 |
5.69 |
2.14 |
3.00 |
1.67 |
| Aurora |
1.45 |
5.77 |
0.00 |
3.05 |
6.06 |
| Gervais |
7.79 |
3.65 |
3.92 |
1.99 |
3.37 |
| Hubbard |
11.41 |
14.71 |
8.96 |
0.40 |
7.17 |
| Keizer |
4.36 |
4.22 |
4.43 |
3.04 |
4.34 |
| Mt. Angel |
5.44 |
4.08 |
4.07 |
4.49 |
5.88 |
| Rural Marion County |
5.49 |
5.29 |
3.54 |
4.03 |
|
| Salem (Marion) |
10.66 |
10.36 |
8.40 |
8.02 |
8.28 |
| Silverton |
9.49 |
9.21 |
5.52 |
8.63 |
6.74 |
| Stayton |
13.30 |
13.72 |
10.79 |
12.76 |
8.19 |
| Turner |
1.45 |
0.73 |
1.46 |
1.67 |
0.85 |
| Woodburn |
10.46 |
7.70 |
6.62 |
5.47 |
6.12 |
|
Polk County Places
|
| Dallas |
6.56 |
7.83 |
4.97 |
3.05 |
5.85 |
| Falls City |
|
21.06 |
11.12 |
15.53 |
|
| Independence |
12.35 |
7.94 |
8.36 |
7.79 |
11.41 |
| Monmouth |
5.07 |
4.00 |
3.53 |
3.62 |
4.42 |
| Rural Polk County |
5.82 |
3.35 |
4.61 |
3.55 |
|
| Salem (Polk) |
5.58 |
4.82 |
5.14 |
4.50 |
|
Source: Oregon Law Enforcement Data
System, compiled by Marion-Polk CHIP. http://www.willamette.edu/publicpolicy/chip
The table below shows the number of arrests
reported in each place in the year 2000, the city's population,
and its rate of arrests per 1,000 people for crimes against people.
|
|
2000
|
|
|
Arrests
|
Population
|
Rate
|
|
Marion County
|
1739
|
284,834
|
6.11
|
|
Aumsville
|
9
|
3,003
|
3.00
|
|
Aurora
|
2
|
655
|
3.05
|
|
Gervais
|
4
|
2,009
|
1.99
|
|
Hubbard
|
1
|
2,483
|
0.40
|
|
Keizer
|
98
|
32,203
|
3.04
|
|
Mt. Angel
|
14
|
3,121
|
4.49
|
|
Salem (Marion)
|
961
|
119,790
|
8.02
|
|
Silverton
|
64
|
7,414
|
8.63
|
|
Stayton
|
87
|
6,816
|
12.76
|
|
Turner
|
2
|
1,199
|
1.67
|
|
Woodburn
|
110
|
20,100
|
5.47
|
|
Polk County
|
269
|
62,380
|
4.31
|
|
Dallas
|
38
|
12,459
|
3.05
|
|
Independence
|
47
|
12,459
|
7.79
|
|
Monmouth
|
28
|
1,509
|
3.62
|
The chart below shows
total arrest rates per 1,000 persons for crimes against people in
Marion and Polk Counties in 1997-2000.
Commentary
Total
arrests rates for crimes against people have decreased in Marion and
Polk Counties in recent years. The Polk County rate has
declined steadily, while the Marion County rate dropped sharply in
1999 and remained steady in 2000. The rate in Marion County
remains higher than that of Polk County.
Arrest
rates for crimes against people have declined in Salem, Woodburn,
and Dallas. For other places, rates have fluctuated somewhat
randomly. This fluctuation may be due at least in part to the
fact that the numbers of arrests are so low for smaller cities, so
that one additional arrest will cause the rate to increase
significantly.
Download the Data
Download Data in Microsoft Excel
Download Data as a
Tab Delimited Text
File (Windows users: right click on this link, save file, and
then open in your favorite spreadsheet; Mac users: click the link
and hold for a second or two, then save the file and open it in a
spreadsheet)
Back
to the top
Rate
of Juvenile Crimes Against People
Contents: Data
Tables | Data Charts |
Commentary | Download Data
New: Juvenile
Person Crimes Data Map (Internet Explorer Users:
zoom to full extent for best map quality)
The
table below shows the rates of juvenile arrests for crimes against
people per 1,000 people. It gives the totals for Marion and
Polk County and rates for places within the two counties.
|
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
| Marion
County |
5.14 |
5.32 |
4.19 |
3.57 |
| Polk
County |
4.53 |
4.47 |
3.99 |
3.47 |
|
Marion County
Places |
| Aumsville |
2.13 |
8.11 |
1.93 |
0.00 |
| Aurora |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Gervais |
9.57 |
4.49 |
2.81 |
2.64 |
| Hubbard |
5.15 |
6.23 |
4.82 |
0.00 |
| Keizer |
3.32 |
3.30 |
3.16 |
1.68 |
| Mt. Angel |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.22 |
4.24 |
| Rural
Marion County |
2.53 |
2.60 |
1.86 |
1.67 |
| Salem
(Marion) |
8.25 |
8.32 |
6.69 |
5.61 |
| Silverton |
7.03 |
7.25 |
3.95 |
4.66 |
| Stayton |
8.29 |
7.05 |
5.38 |
9.50 |
| Turner |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Woodburn |
3.09 |
1.10 |
2.27 |
2.82 |
|
Polk County Places |
| Dallas |
7.25 |
10.09 |
4.45 |
1.44 |
| Falls City |
|
27.69 |
3.40 |
13.38 |
| Independence |
9.26 |
5.10 |
11.65 |
13.38 |
| Monmouth |
4.63 |
1.38 |
1.35 |
6.63 |
| Rural Polk
County |
4.33 |
1.68 |
1.92 |
2.17 |
| Salem
(Polk) |
3.51 |
2.44 |
3.32 |
3.91 |
Source: Oregon Law
Enforcement Data System (LEDS), compiled by Marion-Polk CHIP.
http://www.willamette.edu/publicpolicy/chip
The chart
below shows rates of juvenile arrests per 1,000 people for crimes
against people in Marion and Polk Counties.
Commentary
Arrest rates in
Marion and Polk Counties have
fluctuated over time, with both seeing a consistent and substantial
downturn in recent years. From
1997 through 2000 the rate in Marion County was above that in Polk County.
Download the Data
Download Data in Microsoft Excel
Download Data as a
Tab Delimited Text
File (Windows users: right click on this link, save file, and
then open in your favorite spreadsheet; Mac users: click the link
and hold for a second or two, then save the file and open it in a
spreadsheet)
Back
to the top
|