- Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
- Area(s) of Law: Juvenile Law
- Date Filed: 11-07-2012
- Case #: A150296
- Judge(s)/Court Below: Nakamoto, J. for the Court; Schuman, P. J.; and Wollheim, J.
- Full Text Opinion
Mother appealed the juvenile court's decision to deny dismissal of jurisdiction and wardship over her son, A. In 2010, Mother plead guilty to misdemeanor fourth-degree assault against her daughter O. She was prohibited contact with her children until she completed programs including alcohol treatment and parenting class. Mother filed for dismissal of jurisdiction and wardship after completing the classes. The court denied dismissal and amended the permanency plan from reunification to durable guardianship on finding that she had not progressed significantly enough. Mother argued that she wasn't on notice of what she must do to prevent guardianship and that the judgment was defective under ORS 419B.476. The Court of Appeals held that Mother was on notice that she needed to address her alcohol problem and abusive behavior, and that the court had made the necessary findings of fact under ORS 419B.476(2)(a) and ORS 419B.476(5)(e) and the record supported changing the permanency plan. Affirmed.