- Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
- Area(s) of Law: Criminal Law
- Date Filed: 08-21-2013
- Case #: A146278
- Judge(s)/Court Below: Sercombe, J. for the Court; Ortega, P.J.; and Haselton, C.J., concurring
- Full Text Opinion
Defendant appealed a conviction of two counts of endangering the welfare of a minor. During a traffic stop, Defendant consented to a search of her purse. Defendant was a passenger in a car with her two minor children. The search revealed Defendant’s possession of controlled substances. At trial, Defendant argued that mere possession of the controlled substances is passive conduct, therefore, under ORS 163.575(1)(b) not “activity involving controlled substances.” The trial court denied Defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal on those charges. The State argued that mere possession of controlled substances is an “activity involving controlled substances” based on the text, context and legislative history of ORS 163.575(1)(b). The Court held that Defendant knowingly permitted her children to remain in a place where she possessed, transported, and stored controlled substances, which constituted sufficient evidence to establish that Defendant violated ORS 163.575(1)(b). Thus, the trial court did not error. Affirmed.