Johnson v. Premo

Summarized by:

  • Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
  • Area(s) of Law: Appellate Procedure
  • Date Filed: 06-03-2015
  • Case #: A150451
  • Judge(s)/Court Below: PER CURIAM. Armstrong, P.J.; Haselton, C.J.; & Wollheim, S.J.
  • Full Text Opinion

A party to a judgment by the Court of Appeals may petition to modify the written opinion to correct factual errors. If the petition is correct, the Court may allow the modification.

Petitioner Johnson, a party to a prior judgment of this Court, petitioned the Court to modify a footnote of its opinion, arguing that the footnote may not be factually correct. The petitioner had submitted a supplemental pro se brief which raised an issue of factual discrepancy. The Court accepted the petition and modified the relevant footnote accordingly. Former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Advanced Search