
In 1971 Wangari Maathai became the first African woman to earn a PhD. Six years later she founded the Green Belt Movement, a grassroots environmental organization responsible for transforming the lives of women throughout her native Kenya. She was elected to Parliament in 2003 and soon after was named assistant minister for environment and natural resources. She won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2004.
Maathai had inauspicious beginnings. The daughter of a peasant farmer, she earned scholarships to pursue her education and eventually attend college in the United States. Following completion of her master’s degree, Maathai returned to Kenya with a passion to help her country. Especially after visiting scenic areas of the United States, she thought, “My country should also be beautiful.” Yet she found the harsh effects of clearcut logging — including soil erosion and river pollution — when returning to the places of her childhood.
In talking with Kenyan women, Maathai learned the human toll exacted by this loss of biodiversity — the hours women spent searching for firewood, the growing malnutrition due to a lack of nutritious native foods and the stark need for income. Undaunted, she set to work founding the Green Belt Movement, an organization novel in its holistic effort to integrate environment, democracy and peace. It was this big-picture approach that caught the notice of the Nobel Committee.
Reforestation Brings Renewal
Essentially the Green Belt Movement hires women to reforest Kenya. In the beginning the goal was to plant one tree for every person in Kenya — 15 million at that time. The goal was mocked. So sure the women would fail, Kenya’s conservator of forests promised them all the free trees they needed. He was forced to retract the offer in less than a year. Thus far, the movement has planted more than 30 million trees, and today lush tree cover shades areas where years earlier there was only desert.
The reforestation has created tangible improvements in women’s lives. The trees provide women the wood for fuel and fencing, they produce nutritious food, and they afford women an opportunity to earn their own money. “For every seedling that survives,” Maathai explains, “they get a small compensation, which is both an income for them and an incentive to continue doing this work.” The women’s success has also brought them the respect of the men, who appreciate how the trees increase the property value of their land.
While the Green Belt Movementwas not designed for the benefit of women only, it has been strongly shaped by women’s daily experience. “For the women, the land is the base that sustains their livelihood,” Maathai says. “You hear very few women talk about climate change or the loss of biodiversity, but they will talk about the loss of seeds. They will talk about loss of medicinal plants if the forests are clearcut. Women seem to be the ones who are very close to nature whichever way you look at it.”
A Doorway to Community
The women’s involvement is just one facet of the Green Belt Movement’s decidedly holistic approach. “We use the trees as an entry point,” says Maathai, “but once we are in the community, we try to react or address all the issues that affect the livelihood of those people.”
“We use the trees as an entry point, but once we are in the community, we try to react or address all the issues that affect the livelihood of those people.”
— Wangari Maathai
Maathai compares the organization’s work to a traditional African stool. Unlike most stools that have three individual legs attached to a seat, a traditional African stool is carved from a single solid log. The stool can’t stand with one leg or even two. All three legs must be strong and balanced or the stool will topple. The same is true of the three pillars of the Green Belt Movement’s holistic approach: democracy, the environment, peace. Money will not solve a country’s problems, Maathai explains, unless these three pillars are in place. “We can’t develop where there are two pillars, or one, or none,” she says. Without integrating these elements within a community, people don’t feel the safety and security they need to be productive citizens, and this leads to conflict. “People who feel marginalized and deprived and oppressed are angry people,” she says, “and they undermine our security.
She grew to understand that when access to a country’s resources is not controlled, the people in power hoard the resources for themselves and their allies. Maathai emphasizes the need for democratic systems of government that allow the equitable management of resources, as well as the need for people to empower themselves to take active roles in their government. For this reason, civic education is also a key component of the Green Belt Movement. “Leaders alone can’t build a country,” says Maathai.
Great Risk, Great Reward
While Maathai’s work has won her admirers around the world, for years her safety was threatened as she was considered an enemy of former Kenyan President Daniel arap Moi. Despite her peaceful work, under Moi’s administration Maathai was repeatedly arrested and imprisoned, teargassed, even clubbed into unconsciousness.
Still she continued. In the late ’80s, she made headlines for stopping the construction of a 62-story luxury development, backed by the government, which would have razed one of Nairobi’s public parks. In 1999 Maathai was peacefully protesting the clearing of Karura Forest, one of Kenya’s last remaining indigenous forests, when she and other protestors were severely beaten by security guards. Amnesty International reported that the guards carried machetes, clubs and whips, while police stood by, silent witnesses to the violence. “I understood that in bringing these issues to the floor, I was, of course, putting myself in danger,” Maathai says. “It was a matter of deciding to take that risk.”
At 65, Maathai has unfinished dreams for Kenya. She hopes she still has time to make improvements in the educational system, and that some day she will be able to say every child in Kenya is in school.
Maathai’s oppressors and those who brought her harm have since fallen from power, and she is now the one in Parliament. “They knew they were doing the wrong thing. It’s not like they thought they were doing the right thing,” she says. “I’m sure that today they look back and they wish they were on my side.”