Recent Developments in Dispute Resolution Newsletter
(Willamette University
College Of Law)
June 24, 1998
Arbitration:
NLRB Required To Follow Established Case Law
Arbitration: Award Not Subject To Vacatur Despite Arbitrator
Giving Testimony During The Case.
Arbitration: Reasonable Time Limit Includes The Entire Appeal
Process
Arbitration: Issue Arbitrable If Terms Encompass Subject Of
The Dispute
ADR Online: George Mitchell - Role Model for Mediation
ADR Online: Arbitration And U.S. Courts - Balancing Their
Strengths
ADR Online: Choosing The "Expert" Mediator
ADR Online: Financial Community Taps ADR
Arbitration: NLRB Required To Follow Established Case Law
Burns v. NLRB (D.C. Cir. 6/12/98)
The NLRB decided
to hear a claim where an employer acted pursuant to a viable claim
of right under a collective bargaining agreement (CBA), the matter
in dispute was covered by the arbitration clause in the CBA, and
the employer wanted arbitration. The Court of Appeals found
that the NLRB should have deferred to arbitration because they gave
"no good reason" for failing to follow well-established case law.
The court found under relevant case law that the NLRB was required
to defer to arbitration, "plain and simple."
[Full Decision On Westlaw: 1998 WL 306565]
Arbitration: Award Not Subject To Vacatur Despite Arbitrator
Giving Testimony During The Case.
Meehan v. Nassau Community College (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept 6/8/98)
*This opinion has not been released for publication in the permanent
law - It may be modified, superseded or withdrawn.
Meehan, on behalf of the adjunct teachers union sought to have an
arbitration award upheld which found that the College selectively
discriminated against the adjunct faculty. The New York court
upheld the arbitrator panel’s award despite the fact that the union’s
vice president was on the panel and gave testimony with respect to
the case. The court found that in a tripartite arbitration,
neutrality is not expected and therefore, absent fraud, corruption
or misconduct, an arbitrator’s participation in a hearing does not
prejudice the rights of a party through partiality as described by
CPLR 7511(b).
[Full Decision On Westlaw: 1998 WL 301670]
Arbitration:
Reasonable Time Limit Includes The Entire Appeal Process
State of Connecticut v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 1565 (Conn.App.
6/9/98)
This is an appeal from the trial court's judgment vacating an arbitration
award issued pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement between
the state and Local 1565 of Council 4, AFSCME (union). The
union claims that the trial court improperly concluded that (1)
the arbitrator's award was not mutual, final and definite, and (2)
it did not have authority
to remand the case for rehearing because it applied the incorrect
time limit to the case. The Court of Appeals affirmed the
judgment as to the union's first claim because the remedy essentially
remained open to negotiation at the time the award was rendered.
As to the second claim, the court reversed because they construed
the term "reasonable time" necessarily to include the entire appeal
process, thus the time within which an award is required to be rendered
had not yet expired.
[Full Decision On Westlaw: 1998 WL 296730]
Arbitration:
Issue Arbitrable If Terms Encompass Subject Of The Dispute
Cranberry Area School District v. Cranberry Education Association
(Pa.Cmwlth. 6/18/98)
After reviewing several candidates, the school district hired Don
Hall as Athletic Director. The Education Association filed
a grievance against the school district alleging that they had violated
a portion of their collective bargaining agreement (CBA) by hiring
a non-certified person when a member of the bargaining unit had
also applied for the job. The dispute was referred to an arbitrator
where the arbitrator ruled in favor of the Association. The
school district sought to vacate the order claiming that the issue
was not arbitrable because it was not within the scope of the CBA.
The appellate court affirmed an order of the trial court upholding
the arbitrator’s decision. The court used an “essence test”
to determine whether the terms of the agreement encompass the subject
matter of the dispute. Since the arbitrator construed the
CBA as granting members of the bargaining unit preference over non-certified
persons, the issue of Hall’s employment was arbitrable.
[Full Decision On Westlaw: 1998 WL 317812]
ADR Online: George Mitchell - Role Model for Mediation
By Geoffrey Corry
This article
outlines several strategies and process interventions used by former
US Senator George Mitchell and his mediation team during the “Stormont
Building” talks.
Details: http://www.mediate.com/articles/corry.cfm
ADR Online:
Arbitration And U.S. Courts - Balancing Their Strengths
By Judge José A. Cabranes
The attitude of American courts towards arbitration has shifted
over the last quarter of the century. Where judges once resisted
arbitration, today they often seem to be its biggest boosters. This
quiet revolution in American law has been led by the U.S. Supreme
Court itself.
Details:
http://www.adr.org/currents/arbitration-us_courts.html
ADR Online: Choosing The "Expert" Mediator
By Norman Brand
This article
discusses how to evaluate and choose mediators based on their skills,
expertise, and stature.
Details: http://www.mediate.com/articles/nbrand.cfm
ADR Online:
Financial Community Taps ADR
"From financial
planning organizations to accounting firms, more and more sectors
within the financial community are discovering the advantages of
using alternative dispute resolution methods in resolving client
disputes quickly and efficiently. A coalition of financial
planning organizations announced recently that it has chosen the
American Arbitration Association to administer a mediation program
for financial planners and their clients."
Details:
http://www.adr.org/drt/financial_article.html
Recent Developments in Dispute Resolution
Willamette Law Online
- Willamette University
College of Law
Faculty Editor: Ross Runkel - rrunkel@willamette.edu
Student Editor: Kevin Cheatham - kcheatha@willamette.edu
Student Editorial Board: David
Ward, Alison Hohengarten,
Scott Perry
Website: http://www.willamette.edu/law/wlo/dis-res/
(Past Newsletters: Available Online At The Website Under "DR Newsletter")
Revised
by Kevin Cheatham,
Third Year Law Student
Willamette
University College of Law, Salem, Oregon 97301
|