Recent Developments
in Dispute Resolution Newsletters
July 3, 1997
Recent Developments
in Dispute Resolution 7/03/97
Mediated
settlement is no mistake
Sheng v.
Starkey Laboratories (8th Cir, Jun 27, 1997)
Former Employee sued former Employer under Title VII. Pending
a decision on Employer's motion for summary
judgment, the
court ordered attendance at a mediated
settlement conference
on Monday. The previous Friday the
court signed an order
granting summary judgment to Employer and
mailed copies to
counsel, but the order was not entered
in the docket and the
clerk did not enter judgment. At
Monday's conference with a
magistrate, unaware of Friday's events,
the parties agreed
that Employee would dismiss all claims
in exchange for
Employer's payment of $73,500. When
the magistrate told the
court of the agreement, the court rescinded
the summary
judgment. Later Monday the parties
received copies of all the
papers, and on Tuesday the court dismissed
the action on the
ground it had been settled.
After an evidentiary hearing before another judge, the court
found that the parties had reached agreement
on all essential
terms, but the agreement was unenforceable
on the ground that
it was based upon both parties' mistaken
assumption that
summary judgment had not been granted.
The court rescinded
the dismissal order and reinstated the
summary judgment order
in favor of Employer. Employee appealed.
The 8th Circuit held that the settlement agreement was an
enforceable contract. Employer cannot
avoid the contract on
the ground of "mistake." (1) The
parties had a mutual mistake
as to the value of the case, but no mistake
as to the "very
nature of the deal." Even if the
parties had known of the
summary judgment, litigants who win summary
judgments
routinely settle with their opponents.
(2) Employer assumed
the risk. It knew the order was pending,
and chose the
certainty of settlement over the gamble
on a ruling on the
motion.
Full text --
Willamette University Dispute Resolution Information Service
http://www.willamette.edu/dis-res/
Click on "Recent Developments"
We will email full text to you if you send the message
"request DR9704" to rrunkel@willamette.edu
. . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"Recent Developments
in Dispute Resolution"
Willamette University Center
for Dispute Resolution
Willamette University College
of Law, Salem, Oregon
Ross Runkel, Editor
Richard Birke, Director
rrunkel@willamette.edu
rbirke@willamette.edu
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
Revised
by Kevin Cheatham,
Third Year Law Student
Willamette
University College of Law, Salem, Oregon 97301
|