Oregon Supreme Court

Opinions Filed in September 2012

Burke v. DLCD

Under ORS 195.328(18), the word “owner” as it is used in section 6 of Measure 49, includes all individuals who are either an owner in fee title, purchaser under land sale contract, or a trustee in the property.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Land Use

Ann Sacks Tile and Stone, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.

Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction over the case because taxpayers filed a notice of appeal using electronic service, which was contrary to ORCP 9 G.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Civil Procedure

M.K.F. v. Miramontes

Under ORS 30.866, if a plaintiff seeks both an injunctive order and a judgment for compensatory money damages, the parties are entitled to a jury trial on the claim for money damages.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Civil Procedure

State v. Blok

The Court may exercise their discretion to dismiss an alternative writ if it is not presented in the relator's brief or petition.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Appellate Procedure

Morgan v. Amex Insurance Company

ORS 742.001 does not limit the scope of ORS 742.061 to only those insurance policies delivered or issued for delivery in Oregon.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Attorney Fees

Back to Top