Willamette Law Online

(6 summaries)

Lauren Olson

Intellectual Property

TitleExcerptFilling Date
Flow Valve LLC v. Forum Energy Technologies Inc.Patents: The pleading standard for a patent infringement case is determined by the facts and circumstances surrounding the action. (07-18-2014)
Logan Developers v. Heritage Bldgs.Copyright: Evidence of common elements and standard features shared by two designs are not enough to prove copyright infringement when the two designs are neither extrinsically nor intrinsically similar.(06-05-2014)
Toys v. Pearl Enters.Trademarks: When the re-sale of a product does not involve the actual “use” of a trademark, the re-sale of the product does not constitute trademark infringement. (05-23-2014)
Medtronic Minimed v. Animas Corp.Patents: When a patent involves mean-plus-function language the terms must be capable of being comprehended by an expert within that field in order to be held invalid for indefiniteness. (05-08-2014)
Ergowerx Int'l v. Maxell Corp. of Am.Trademarks: A distributor who sells trademarked goods that are genuine does not infringe on the trademark and does not violate the Lanham Act.(04-23-2014)
Louisiana Contractors Licensing Service, Inc. v. American Contractors Exam Services, Inc. Copyright: Copyrighted exam questions were reproduced and marketed without permission from the holder of the copyright, but the infringement was de minimis and was therefore not actionable. (04-07-2014)