(Link to Willamette University)

 
 
 We are pictured outside of the hallowed hall known as Smullin Hall.
This is where, three intense hours a week we were enlightened with the
knowledge of framing.  We have fun.
 
 
Dan, Chuck and Jeff Do Some Framing!
 
 
 
  1. Definitions
  2. Bibliography


Course description as it appears in the Willamette University Course Catalog:
    Media Framing (Rhetoric 362, Fall 1998): This course examines new accounts as the construct the meaning of the events they report.  Students explore how reality is shaped when the media privileges a particular frame for the events; sketches familiar plot lines, characters, or ideologies; or gives authority to some voices and silences others.  finally, the course addresses the effect of media conventionalizing, in the symbolic complexes addressed and the formulaic stories the spawn, on both the range of interpretations and the range of topics that are publicly addressed.

Framing War Films

    Our Web page will look at how three different films have framed war.  In trying to understand war and how it is framed (see definition of framing) within these movies we have reviewed the movies several times, and then applied media framing theory to them.  While the application of this theory serves the purpose of picking apart the themes and frames of the movie, the general understanding of war frames in film comes from what information is received through that analysis.  Each of our pages deals with a different movie.  We have tried to choose a wide variety from the war film genre in an attempt to represent three different types of wars.  Click on each name to go to the person's page of your choice.
 
 

 

Our Pages
The Movies
Jeff's Page: Courage Under Fire
Chuck's Page: Full Metal Jacket
Dan's Page:  Starship Troopers
 
Our group members hard at work!
 
Jeff Baker
 
Charles Washington III
 
Daniel Bair ???


 
 
Click Here For
Link to Media Framing Class Page
 
 

The following is a table of media framing terms and their definitions.
 
Framing: the process by which the content of discourse is organized.  Framing uses various techniques such as inclusion and exclusion to create the desired effect.
Salience: is making parts of the discourse stand out for an audience.  Salience makes discourse memorable for the audience. (Entman)
Coherence: discourse has a series of examples that maintain a sense of truth within the text itself.
Fidelity: discourse is related to and seen as truthful in relation to previous works on the same subject.
Contestable Categories: the use of false or not wholly true categorizations and representations of situations or prominent figures of discourse. (Edelman)
Myth: the stories we create to explain that which can not be explained or that which needs to be explained with fictional characters or situations.
Sanitizing: cleaning or softening harsh discourse in order to take away the abrasive effect it may have. (Katz)
Equalizing: showing both sides of an argument with the most equal attention to both possible. (Katz)
Demonizing: making the discourse or characters in the discourse evil and demon like. (Katz
Selection: taking specific parts of information and including them to the exclusion of other information. (Entman)
Script: refers to an established and stable sequence of activities and coomponents of an event that have been internalized as a structured mental representation of the event.(Pan and Kosicki)
Hypothesis Testing: the main body of discourse that presents episodes, background information and quotes to increase psychological proximity to the audiences.(Pan and Kosicki)
Personalizing: making a character more personal as a way of relating those characters to the audience. (Katz)


 
Bibliography:
Darnton, Robert.  "Writing News and Telling Stories."  Daedalus, v. 104, 1975pp. 175 - 194.

Edelman, Murray.  "Contestable Categories and Public Opinion." Political Communication, v.
    10, 19?, pp. 211-242.

Entman, Robert M.  "Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm."  Journal of
    Communication, 43(4), Autumn, 1993, pp. 52 -58.

Ettema, James S., and Theodore L. Glasser.  "Narrative and Moral Force: The Realization of
    Innocence and Guilt Through Investigative Journalism."  Journal of Communication, 38(3),
    Summer, 1988, pp. 8-26

Katz, E. "The End of Journalism?  Notes on Watching the War"  Journal of Communication, 42(3), 1992, pp. 5-?.

Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G.  "Framing Analysis:  An Approach to News Discourse"
    Political Communication, v. 10, 1993, p.55-75.

Question of Equality, pt. 3.  Videotape.  Dir. Issac Julien.  Testing the Limits Production/Channel  Four Television, U.K./Independent Television Service.  1995.  55 min.

Schudson, Michael.  "The Politics of Narrative Form: The Emergence of News Conventions in
    Print and Television."  Daedalus, 3 No. 4, 1982, pp. 97 - 111.

Toplin, Robert.  History by hollywood University of Illinois Press Chicago 1996.

Tuchman, Gayle.  "Telling Stories."  Journal of Communication, v. 26 n. 4  Autumn, 1976, pp.
    93 - 97.