Gottfried Wilhelm
LeibnizLeibniz's notation, which includes the familiar
,
,
and
,
has survived virtually unchanged over 300 years. Leibniz's notation is
usually much more effective than Newton's. This was unfortunate for
British
mathematicians, who through loyalty to Newton used his notation. Some
have
argued that loyalty to one side of the controversy held British
mathematics
back quite a long while.
Leibniz, like others of his day, was for the most part unconcerned with rigorous mathematical questions like "What, exactly, is an infinitely small number that is not yet zero?". The new methods of calculus were so good at "getting the answers", answers that were verifiably true in most cases, that nobody worried about proving the method. As George F. Simmons puts it:
| "In this headlong rush to exploit the wealth of applications of the new analysis, there was little interest in pausing to indulge in leisurely examinations of the basic ideas. This uncritical spirit prevailed throughout the eighteenth century, and it was not until the early decades of the nineteenth century that serious attention was given to the logical foundations of the subject" - Calculus Gems, Brief Lives and Memorable Mathematics, 1992 McGraw-Hill |
willamette.edu