Poli 212 Western Political Philosophy
Professor Sammy Basu |
Historiography and Locke |
|
|
JOHN LOCKE (1632-1704)
|
Author
|
Text
|
Context
|
Whig
|
Heroic embodiment
of the various roots of liberalism: tolerant Protestantism, trust in reason,
scientific empiricism, and so on.
Locke was intellectually and in his secretive political involvements a
rallying figure for liberal freedom (378f). |
This is an
epoch-making text by a heroic and charitable author. It fends off absolutist property and
patriarchy (242, 248, 306) in order to define the role of government or
political power as protection of ‘property’ qua the life, liberty and estate
of everyone (262f). Individuals are
self-owners (274, 283, 289, 324, 351, 359).
Their consent to enter society (cf. Leviathan) (311) and again by
majority as members of society to create the legislature is crucial (309,
310, 314, 322). Conquest conversely is
always illegitimate (355ff). Powers
of government are best divided between legislative and executive (335f) and
subject to the rule of law (for rich/poor, court/country alike, and
regardless of religious belief) (334) because power corrupts and absolute monarchs
are but men (267, 307,308, 335). The
people retain the right of d/revolution (328, 337, 373). |
Temporary monarchic setback in
response to Puritan Revolution is decisively overcome in a Glorious
Revolution that effectively makes Parliament primary, and frees the political
and economic energies of individuals. |
Marxist
|
Author
Grandfather was a
wealthy clothier, father was a lawyer and small land-owner who loses
money. Patronage of one of father’s
clients gets Locke into Westminster school.
Attached to university, not ordained as priest but instead becomes
medical doctor. Becomes assistant to
a radical landed aristocrat, Shaftesbury.
Locke preoccupied with, and as a personal matter wants to justify, his
own financial security and success. |
Text
Text reveals the
ideological duplicity of liberal regime yoked to capitalist agenda. It replaces political absolutism with
absolute property right (253) and repeats claim that politics exists to
protect property (262f). Though it affirms
labor as the basis of property, it regards manual work as drudgery, assumes
servants do it (275), and justifies the riches of entrepreneurs and investors
(279, 285). Spoilage proviso (276) is
a ruse, since money entails consent to wealth acquisition (286). Affirms freedom and equality for all, yet claim
that ‘everyone’ wants government to provide ‘guards’ and ‘fences’ for
property (327, 360, 373) does not make sense for the landless poor who own
only their labor power. Text seems to
suggest that both taxation (334) and representation should be proportional to
wealth (343). Text also justifies
enclosing and improving wastes and natives of America (281, 284) albeit not
through [Spanish] conquest. Earlier
Carolinas constitution defends rule by the propertied, alongside hereditary
indentured servitude (210, 211, 224,
226, 230). |
Context
Civil War was a
class war. English revolution was a
bourgeois revolution that relied upon Puritanism because it rationalized their
values, at the expense of the landed aristocracy and the established church. It thus reflects the transition from feudalism
to capitalism, i.e., the growing predominance of urban mercantile economies
and post-guild social relations over rural and landed economies and
relations. (Christopher Hill). |
Feminist
|
Author
Lifelong bachelor. |
Text
In refuting
absolutism and patriarchy, text argues that Adam/husband does not have
dominion over Eve/wife, that power over children is not paternal but parental,
and that what is allotted father is shard with mother (292, 357). Marriage is a mutual contract with right
of exit (300-2). However, Locke
acquiesces to de facto reality of ‘abler and stronger’ husband(299, 302) even
though he rejects de facto monarchy (313, 319). Indeed, he affirms role of ‘nursing fathers’ (318). In addition, Locke endorses a masculinist
relationship to the extraction of use-value from nature (250, 287, 357). |
Context
England remains a
deeply patriarchal society in which the authoritarianism of king, father,
husband and master are understood to echo each other and manifest divine
intent as given in Bible. |
Post-Modern
|
Author
Conservative
convictions of his youth give way under exposure to anxieties of radical
skepticism but are resolved in a minimalist Protestantism that everyone must
find reasonable so that he can feel secure. |
Text
Text is notably
insidious in that while it stresses freedom and equality, these values are
only for those who not only have economic wherewithal but who more basically
measure up psychologically. Liberty
is not license (263, 292). Locke’s
liberal regime is for safe, stable, sober, mature, rational and industrious
adults (277) who have internalized both a grateful (to God the maker 264,
289, 293, 300, sa 228f) and disciplined work ethic in the world and a
motivating anxiety about the Day of Judgment (272, 278, 386). The text justifies the denigration or
exclusion of the poor but also the psychologically different, Catholics,
Negro slaves, and the Indians of the Americas (290, 326, 331, 351) |
Context
Conversion of protestant
reformation into superficially secular tolerant culture and mores, so that
sublimated assumptions about individuality and ethics in the world enables a ‘civilizing’
agenda of capitalism domestically and colonialism abroad. In both cases, goal is creation of the
austere self.. |
Useful sites: