|
|
POLITICS 212(TH) WESTERN POLITICAL
PHILOSOPHY |
Department of Politics Willamette University |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author
|
Text
|
Context
|
Whig
|
Having seen political realities from within as well as
from above and below Machiavelli gives an unflinching account of the
necessity of the problem of ‘dirty hands’ in politics but also of the
inevitability of taking the popular will seriously. |
For all their differences, the two texts converge
on the view that while a visionary leader is essential to the founding of new
regimes and re-ordering of corrupt ones, that that individual ought to retain
the sympathy of the many, and ought for the sake of deserved glory to
establish a mixed republican law-abiding regime with a citizen militia in
which executive and distinct institutions for rich few and poor many check
and balance one another. |
Italian city-states, including Florence are small and
vulnerable to the new realities of nation-states. |
Marxist
|
Author
Deprived of full citizenship by his illegitimate birth and
poverty, deprived as well of real opportunities, Machiavelli is a bit
ideologically desperate with no choice but to write what he thinks his
audience wants to read to secure him self a job. |
Text
Text is too preoccupied by the myth of the great artist,
the superficial showmanship of political power, to realize that the real
source of power: is the system of economic ownership. Machiavelli does note that most
people will sooner forget the death of their father than forgive the loss of
their patrimony. He also
stresses that a republic must expand, i.e., become imperialist or
disintegrate. However, though he
claims to view politics from below he shows no great sympathy for the working man, counsels bread and circuses to keep them
amused, and regards the peasants as lice. |
Context
The rise of the nation-states is a function of the linked
development of war-making, tax-taking and
state-building. It also reflects
the
growing predominance of urban mercantile and manufacturing economies and
post-guild social relations over rural and landed economies and feudal
relations. |
Feminist
|
Author
Machiavelli had love affairs but also probably consorted
with prostitutes. His attitudes
towards women are conventionally patriarchal and patronizing. |
Text
Text articulates a deeply gendered conception of the
nature of public action in the world, casting the masculine, activist,
imposing will of the vir against
both effeminate inaction and the capricious, masochistic Fortuna. Although, he is also extremely
impressed by Caterina Sforza she reflects the masculinist flipside of the
contextual view of the noblewoman as an aesthetic thing: ‘decorous,
chaste, and doubly dependent--on her husband as well as the prince’
(Kelly). Other than that, women
are absent. |
Context
Women did not have a Renaissance. On the contrary, as a result of 1) the
regulation of female sexuality,2) access to economic
and political roles, and 3) their roles in cultural
construction, women suffered a loss of prestige and possibilities. |
Post-Modern
|
Author
Machiavelli is party to the Renaissance formulation of the
individual self-fashioning or self-maximizing on multiple fronts. He is himself a protean self, who
rises from lowly beginnings to become accomplished in several areas of the
human arts. |
Text
Text eschews the grand metaphysical narratives of Plato
and Aristotle and Christianity in which the world is taken to be subject to
natural purposes, functions, or telos
or divine providence. Instead it
presents a world that is constantly changing under circumstances that are
partially fated but also open to activist effort and the imposition of will. The world is what such men, treating
others the way artists handle clay, make of it, even if this devastates
societies. |
Context
Re-naissance of classical themes and preoccupations
sponsors repudiation of grand Christian narratives but their replacement by
new myths of reason, science, and the world-creating individual self. |