|
|
POLI 480W Prof. |
Author Reader |
Date |
Reader evaluation of draft of Second Draft and
feedback on areas of improvement
á
title:
subtitle (catchy:explanatory?)
á
abstract
(clear and formal prose? Good summary?)
á
ten keywords
(appropriate? useful?)
á
outline (clear
yet succinct)
á
introduction
(does it grab, hook, set stage, generate controversy?) any suggestions?
á
body of paper
in sections according to outline
(is there a logic to the structure? Do the sections
come in the optimal order? Is
there controversy? Are there
winners and losers?)
á
conclusion
(are you clear on where research on this question should
go in light of the paper?),
á
bibliography
(are these 25-30 articles, 15-20 books, effectively used in the text and notes?),