Beath v. Douglas County
Where a local government does not consider all uses within the impact area and all predicted conflicts for an application under OAR 660-023-0180(5)(a) and (5)(b), LUBA will remand.
Area(s) of Law:- Land Use
Schaefer v. Marion County
Where a county’s approval of a Statewide Planning Goal 3 exception is based solely on proximity to a transportation facility, LUBA will reverse the county’s decision.
Area(s) of Law:- Land Use
Landwatch Lane County v. Lane County
Where a parcel is wholly transferred but later divided into separate lots because of a lien foreclosure on part of the parcel, LUBA will validate the division.
Area(s) of Law:- Land Use
Claus v. City of Sherwood
ORS 92.040 authorizes an applicant to develop one portion of the subdivided property under the standards in effect at the time of the subdivision application and develop another portion of the subdivided property under the standards currently in effect.
Area(s) of Law:- Land Use